Standing while black

ftpftpThe Obama Administration, aided by the civil rights establishment, has shut down the uprising in Ferguson, MO. They accomplished this craven feat through two channels.

On the ground, they permitted the local police free reign to extinguish non-violent protest. The mechanism was very simple. The police cordoned off the area and certain locations within to inhibit mobility. They prevented people from assembling on a street they had blocked off, instead compelling them to keep moving. They raided a church that had served as an operational support to the demonstrators and confiscated supplies like milk, to treat victims of tear gas. They even raided the home of somebody making T-shirts sympathetic to the action. They would periodically send lines of thuggish county police to scatter groups of innocent people. They applied liberal, indiscriminate doses of tear gas, concussion grenades, and rubber bullets.

The inability to assemble is key. That’s how the authorities busted up the Occupy sites, once again to the indifference of the White House. The legal issue is explicated here.

The other channel was political. It was Rev Al Sharpton to the not-rescue, reportedly the Administration’s man on the ground. What is the opposite of agitator? There was a movie called “The Cooler” starring Bill Macy. As a casino employee, his gift was showing up at a table where a gambler was on a hot streak; his mystical powers would cause the winning streak to blow up in failure. Al was the cooler, taking control of the Brown family’s message, telling everyone what they should and shouldn’t be concerned about, failing to defend against the blatant denial of constitutional rights.

The civil rights groups failed in similar fashion. So did local African-American politicians. How do I know this? It’s very simple. None of them at any point said, people, we have a right to assemble. I’m going to stand in the goddamn street and challenge the police to arrest me. If you can stand getting arrested, why not come along? Nobody did that. It was the key to promoting continuing mobilization. Nobody did it. We did hear them talk about voter registration, and bully for them. There are parallels in the latter respect to the dissolution of the actions in the Wisconsin state capital a few years ago (in response to which Obama was also mute).

In the same vein, aside from initial comment that the police ought not to arrest journalists — subsequently ignored by police — the president and attorney-general limited their remarks to perverse digressions about wayward black youth and promises to investigate the shooting. (The capacity of Federal prosecutors to do anything about the shooting is quite limited.)

It is of course true that the Administration cannot command local police to do this or that. They cannot micro-manage local police. But they can issue remarks on lapses that I think could have had a powerful effect. It would have meant calling out bad actors. Perhaps — I’m not a lawyer, so this is speculative — they could have supported the ACLU suit to defend the right to assemble and freedom of the press. More was called for besides showing up and hugging the folks.

Then we have the media on site. One obnoxious narrative was the twinning of “violence” (meaning looting and throwing water bottles; as far as I could tell, the use of Molotov cocktails was much more limited) with peaceful protest. Of course, most of the violence was coming from the cops, and the priority should be defending basic rights of protesters. Notwithstanding that simple principle, we had the absurd adulation of good Captain Ron, beneficiary of softball interviews punctuating his direction of police violence and the arrest of journalists. Journalists against journalism, indeed.

I did see some signs of life on the Melissa Harris-Perry show and in Michael Eric Dyson’s column. They are both sensitive to the wayward black youth dodge, but not so much to the real-time demobilization tactics of the local authorities and the parallel indifference of the Administration.

A few types of distractions have become more clear in the wake of this event. One is that the demilitarization of the police, something for which I had a good word myself, is pretty superficial. You have a disenfranchised, impoverished community being preyed on by local elites and beat on by racist, not-even-professional cops. That they have tanks is beside the point. Michael Brown did not fall victim to a tank.

The other distraction is the default objections to violence and the obligation of the police to do something about it. There will always be anti-social elements at any agitated, mass gathering. The job of the police is to let people do what is legal and arrest people who do things that are illegal. This does not imply mass punishment in the form of tear gas assaults on undifferentiated crowds of people. Not letting people assemble is illegal. Pointing guns at people is illegal. Shoving them around for non-violent assembly is assault; it’s illegal. The police ran riot. They didn’t prevent disorder, they preserved disorder.

Unfair? Inaccurate? Feel free to weigh in.

P.S. See also Brittney Cooper in Salon and Glen Ford in Black Agenda Report.





Standing while black — 13 Comments

  1. Thanks for saying this Max. Let me second you’re sentiments. For others reading this, now is your time to stand up. Do you stand by as this willful militarization kills people to keep you silent? I say not! Go to your communities and raise your voices! Your people need you!

  2. Completely right on IMO.

    Small factual clarification: Cops raided the church meeting hall where medical and food supplies were stored, clearly to intimidate and without any legit reason, but did not in the end remove anything.

  3. Thanks Nell, though I do recall hearing a report that the cops made off with provisions. Happy to be corrected.

  4. And then not an active verb to be found. By this argument, you shut down the uprising.

    “The Obama Administration, aided by the civil rights establishment, has shut down the uprising in Ferguson, MO. They accomplished this craven feat through two channels.”

  5. Pingback: Music Monday: Life Finds a Way? – Bridget Magnus and the World as Seen from 4'11"

  6. Hmm, agree/disagree? Well I have two thoughts here.

    One, it is great to have MaxSpeak back. We had a lot of great Social Security discussions here before you went Dark by going to the Dark Side (aka getting a Paying Gig). So there is that.

    Two, your opening shows a little two much Green Lanternism as it pertains to the Obama Administration. It is one thing to say that they have done too little and a quite different thing to claim that they are aiding and abetting and perhaps directing the action. Because there are always constraints on action.

    On the other hand I am mindful of the old expressions heard in the times of the last Czars and the early years of the Nazis when clear instances of injustices arose:

    “If only the Czar knew!” “If only the Fuhrer knew!” When the truth was that either the Czar or Fuhrer either knew full well and didn’t care, knew well and approved of the actions of his minions, or in the most horrific instances was the prime director.

    But I am having a hard time even seeing Obama as Czar Nick the II. Still less as the Austrian Corporal. Because even if he knows there just aren’t the magic powers implied by Green Lanternism.

  7. Thanks, Bruce.

    I was very specific and, I thought, qualified about what Obama could have done but didn’t, and how it might have made a difference.

  8. I read and RT’d such a report before learning it was wrong. Think cops would have taken stuff but for quick arrival on scene of a couple of media types.

  9. “shut down”

    Then a bunch of

    didn’t prevent,
    didn’t act,
    didn’t agitate,
    didn’t say,
    didn’t challenge,
    didn’t get arrested,
    didn’t remark,
    didn’t support.

  10. And look, I’m not trying to bust your butt, and I’m as pleased as anyone to have you back fighting the good fight.

    It was just a really weak support after such a strong declared thesis.

  11. You have a point, but I don’t buy it. The moral obligation of the Administration to act affirmatively in this situation from my standpoint was overwhelming. The problem is huge, as all the other examples flooding the Internet attest, this particular case is egregious, and the denial of rights by the cops was flagrant. As you know, other presidents have sent the national guard in to defend rights. This one and his A-G didn’t even say anything.

    In any case, thanks for visiting.

  12. Pingback: The people versus St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert P. McCulloch |

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.